Laydyne

Factories & warehouses / WORKED EXAMPLE

Day-of-picking staffing

Compare staffing schedules and cart availability against the same picking list and dispatch deadline.

No sign-in needed: open it in Studio, look around and edit it in 2D and 3D. Log in to connect your own AI and save; Pro runs your changes. Opening a project asks before replacing your current space.

Can today’s orders be staged on time, and when should another picker join?

Who uses it
Warehouse supervisors planning the day’s picking shift
How it can create value
Check whether extra staffing can meet the cutoff before allocating people. A cart shortage can still limit the work.
Bring your site data
Your order lines, pick locations, release times, cutoff, measured picking times and available people and carts.
Turn a comparison into a business decision →
SAME EDITABLE PROJECT
Actual Laydyne 3D model: Day-of-picking staffing

01 / SETUP

A model you can inspect.

An assumed warehouse with 96 pick faces. Each list uses a picker and a cart; the model follows travel, picking, staging and the return trip. Normal and peak demand are compared separately.

Release a list → collect a cart → pick → stage the order → return

Change one thing

Add a picker at the start or after 15 minutes, then test a shortage of carts.

Read the consequence

Read staged lists and boxes at the deadline, alongside the planned staff-hours.

View the starting inputs
Floor width (m)
60
Floor depth (m)
40
Assumed pick faces
96

These dimensions are assumptions for the example.

02 / DECLARED INPUTS

A model you can inspect.

Normal demand (lists)
24
Peak demand (lists)
48
Compared staffing plans
4

These are declared example inputs. The downloadable project and reports preserve the layout, order list, assumptions and calculation version for review.

03 / COMPARE THE DECISION

Which staffing plan meets the staging cutoff?

Planned staff-hours describe scheduled capacity, not actual utilisation or cost. A staged order is delivered; a returned list also includes the trip back.

Normal demand · 24 lists

Recommended among the evaluated plans: Third picker after 15 min · 3 carts.

One run, seed 20261001. Observation window 60 minutes.

Normal demand · 24 lists
Staffing planStaged lists / requiredStaged boxes / requiredPlanned staff-hoursConditions
2 pickers · 3 carts21 / 24250 / 2892Does not meet the conditions
3 pickers from the start · 3 carts24 / 24289 / 2893Meets the tested conditions
Third picker after 15 min · 3 carts24 / 24289 / 2892.75Meets the tested conditions
3 pickers from the start · 2 carts21 / 24250 / 2893Does not meet the conditions
Open the full comparison report (HTML)
Calculation evidence and secondary measures

process-des-2.5.1 · Study input hash: fnv1a-30d6c27f

2 pickers · 3 carts

Returned lists
20
Saved option
5f079e08-7454-4fa1-8596-b0c4807a6fd8
Input hash
fnv1a-cd33e952

3 pickers from the start · 3 carts

Returned lists
24
Saved option
4ce37381-9e95-4873-8a4a-c00dab629923
Input hash
fnv1a-493b70c3

Third picker after 15 min · 3 carts

Returned lists
24
Saved option
70012930-7a93-490e-bacb-596365d09a7d
Input hash
fnv1a-57d4248f

3 pickers from the start · 2 carts

Returned lists
20
Saved option
b50cdcec-3420-4a8a-a863-e6d0400e13df
Input hash
fnv1a-124df5f5

Peak demand · 48 lists

None of the tested plans meets the conditions.

One run, seed 20261001. Observation window 60 minutes.

Peak demand · 48 lists
Staffing planStaged lists / requiredStaged boxes / requiredPlanned staff-hoursConditions
2 pickers · 3 carts21 / 48250 / 5772Does not meet the conditions
3 pickers from the start · 3 carts30 / 48360 / 5773Does not meet the conditions
Third picker after 15 min · 3 carts27 / 48324 / 5772.75Does not meet the conditions
3 pickers from the start · 2 carts21 / 48250 / 5773Does not meet the conditions
Open the full comparison report (HTML)
Calculation evidence and secondary measures

process-des-2.5.1 · Study input hash: fnv1a-191dfb79

2 pickers · 3 carts

Returned lists
20
Saved option
a9522bcd-0b13-4aaa-8478-66af00f1b792
Input hash
fnv1a-06c752ca

3 pickers from the start · 3 carts

Returned lists
30
Saved option
8825fbba-7790-458f-bdca-4accef8d0153
Input hash
fnv1a-d6e92ef7

Third picker after 15 min · 3 carts

Returned lists
27
Saved option
c302d154-8c74-41e5-9fd0-d8637fd128a4
Input hash
fnv1a-3134708b

3 pickers from the start · 2 carts

Returned lists
20
Saved option
bcc7c0b1-b75a-4c5b-b248-3b47c0c5c785
Input hash
fnv1a-4612cd81

Before using this for a real shift

Replace the example orders and measured times, confirm staff and cart availability, then rerun before allocating a real shift.

Assumptions, input files and primary sources
  • The 60 × 40 m floor and 96 pick faces are illustrative assumptions.
  • Inventory is assumed available. Replenishment, worker collisions, fatigue and picking errors are outside this example.
  • The picker and cart use an assumed circular clearance of 0.35 m radius. Actual cart size, loads and turning space still need checking; collision avoidance is not simulated.
  • Compare the four plans within each demand case. Normal and peak demand are separate decisions, not a paired comparison.

Primary sources

  • DHL Louveira · WSC 2012

    Daily picking demand, hourly staffing and the decision to negotiate work that available resources cannot finish.

  • Mauá · PMN06 · 2014

    A follow-up project describes a planning tool that was difficult to update and slow to respond.

  • DHL Louveira · WSC 2024

    A retrospective of the earlier decision-support project; it does not establish current use or demand for Laydyne.

04 / MAKE IT YOURS

Plan in 2D. Inspect in 3D. Keep the whole project.

  1. Open and adjust. Switch between 2D and 3D; edit a part, a floor or an input. Both views describe the same model.
  2. Connect your agent for free. Sign in, choose Connect AI and connect Codex or Claude Code. Ask it to inspect the example, edit the layout and check a route.
  3. Save a checkpoint. Export → Project JSON, or ask the agent to export the complete project. Import it later to restore floors, scenarios, saved comparisons and the selected view.
  4. Compare with Pro. Run an edited scenario or compare frozen options under the same demand. Pro also adds built-in AI and manual cloud saving.