Waits in a restaurant depend not only on the number of seats but on their shape (tables for four or for two, or a counter), on how people arrive, where they queue and who does what. Here are seven examples an AI simulated in earlier articles: a lunch, a ramen shop, a hotel breakfast, a staff canteen, a buffet, a café and an izakaya (a Japanese pub serving small dishes). The AI used the tool it calls over MCP (sweep_process_parameters), and each figure is the mean of 20 runs.

1. By the set-up

ExampleSet-upWhat is measuredResult
A 40-seat lunch (24 parties an hour)Tables for four kept wholeParties seated27.5 parties
A 40-seat lunch (24 parties an hour)Pulled apart into tables for twoParties seated33.8 parties
A ramen shop (20 parties at noon)10 seatsWaiting for a seat2.5 minutes
A ramen shop (20 parties at noon)12 seatsWaiting for a seat0.9 minutes
A hotel breakfast (240)24 tables for two (48 seats)Time to a seat (mean)13.3 minutes
A hotel breakfast (240)18 tables for two and a 12-seat counter (48 seats)Time to a seat (mean)3.4 minutes
A hotel breakfast (240)24 tables for two and a 12-seat counter (60 seats)Time to a seat (mean)0.7 minutes
A staff canteen (240, 80 seats)One lunch breakWaiting for a seat (mean)583.0 seconds
A staff canteen (240, 80 seats)Two lunch breaksWaiting for a seat (mean)172.7 seconds
A staff canteen (240, 80 seats)Three lunch breaksWaiting for a seat (mean)9.8 seconds
A buffet for 200Everyone at once, one sideA guest from the seat and back17.1 minutes
A buffet for 200Everyone at once, both sidesA guest from the seat and back9.2 minutes
A buffet for 200Tables called every 60 seconds, both sidesA guest from the seat and back2.3 minutes
A café's morningTwo cashiers, two baristasTime to a drink2.3 minutes
A café's morningOne cashier, two baristasTime to a drink5.4 minutes
A café's morningTwo cashiers, one baristaTime to a drink8.8 minutes
An izakaya (9 groups an hour from 19:00 to 21:00)Groups of one or two wait for a tableGroups that left5.6 groups
An izakaya (9 groups an hour from 19:00 to 21:00)Groups of one or two wait for the counterGroups that left4.2 groups

2. What they show

  • The shape of the seats matters more than their number. Pulling the 40-seat lunch's tables apart into tables for two seats 33.8 parties instead of 27.5. At the hotel breakfast, the 13.3 minutes to a seat with 24 tables for two fall to 3.4 with 18 tables and a 12-seat counter, the same 48 seats (single guests no longer take a table for two to themselves).
  • Spread out the arrivals. At the staff canteen, still with 80 seats, the wait for a seat is 172.7 seconds with two lunch breaks and 9.8 with three. At the buffet a guest takes 9.2 minutes with both sides open, and 2.3 with tables called every 60 seconds as well.
  • Put staff where the work backs up. At the café, the wait for a drink is 5.4 minutes with one cashier and 8.8 with one barista: which one you cut matters. Two more seats at the ramen shop cut the wait for a seat from 2.5 minutes to 0.9.
  • Change the seats groups wait for. At an izakaya with 9 groups an hour from 19:00 to 21:00, 5.6 groups leave when groups of one or two wait for a table. When they wait for the counter, this falls to 4.2 groups.

3. The articles

4. How to ask an AI

In this restaurant (as drawn, 40 seats), with 24 parties an hour at the lunch peak, compare how many parties get a table with the tables for four kept whole and pulled apart into tables for two, 20 runs each.

5. What this does not cover

  • How many parties come and how big they are, and the times to eat, cook and pay, are each article's assumptions. Replace them with your own bills and arrivals.